TL;DR NY Times predicts trump will remain on the ballet and the ruling will likely have a very narrow basis in hopes of achieving unanimous consensus from the court.
TL;DR NY Times predicts trump will remain on the ballet and the ruling will likely have a very narrow basis in hopes of achieving unanimous consensus from the court.
In response specifically to the ‘Due Process’ argument, wouldn’t the counter arguments listed in this article cover that? They reference the original use of the 14th against Confederate Officers and how they were, as terms for the surrender, not criminally charged but still barred from serving in political office.
https://reason.com/volokh/2023/12/26/why-section-3-disqualifications-doesnt-require-a-prior-conviction-on-criminal-charges-of-insurrection/
The Lemmy post where I found the article:
https://lemmy.org/post/3564