• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think voters are smart and can tell the difference between the party that would extend benefits if they could and the party that would have ended benefits way sooner if they could have.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would you think that? Large swathes of the country routinely vote against their own interests while blaming their problems on the party that would actually help them. And then they don’t choose to access realistic information that would help them make better decisions.

    • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your optimism is inspiring, but IMO misplaced 🙁 Here in Canada conservatives like to use the same trick election after election: they strip “safety net” bare all until ~6mo before election. Then they throw a few one-time cheques before election and… voila: all is forgotten and forgiven. Same here in reverse: any downfalls just before election would define voter behaviour, not the systemic view at ability to govern.