Well, that’s fucked.
This isn’t funny, but I chuckled at the comparetively ridiciously small fine put on top.
The police confiscated the 1.058m yuan (£120,651) Ma had earned as a software developer between September 2019 and November 2022, describing it as “illegal income”, as well as fining him 200 yuan (£23).
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The programmer, surnamed Ma, was issued with a penalty notice by the public security bureau of Chengde, a city in Hebei province, on 18 August.
Ma said the police seized his phone, laptop and several computer hard drives upon learning that he worked for an overseas company, holding them for a month.
Charlie Smith (a pseudonym), the co-founder of GreatFire.org, a website that tracks internet censorship in China, said: “Even if this decision is overturned in court, a message has been sent and damage has been done.
VPNs, which help users circumvent the “great firewall” of internet censorship by making it look as if their device is in a different country, operate in a legal grey area in China.
The government generally turns a blind eye to the relatively small number of individuals who use the technology to access websites such as Google, Facebook, Twitter and, often, view pornography.
In June, Radio Free Asia reported that a Uyghur student, Mehmut Memtimin, was serving a 13-year sentence in Xinjiang for using a VPN to access “illegal information”.
The original article contains 682 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Seems like they charged him not for using a vpn but for believing he should havw freedom. The vpn was just a way to get him on whateveer they could
He didn’t even really use it for freedom, it claims he just used it for zoom to work for a Turkish company
A “senior China correspondent” that cites Radio Free Asia for anything can probably be safely ignored, especially given her history of articles.
In June, Radio Free Asia reported that a Uyghur student, Mehmut Memtimin, was serving a 13-year sentence in Xinjiang for using a VPN to access “illegal information”.
The way they did so here was actually pretty responsible. They stuck to the facts (that RFA actually said this) and quoted their use of the phrase “illegal information” appropriately
